The unbearable wilderness of the being

What is wilder? Man or the wild nature? Animals kill mainly to eat in order to survive. Man does not kill necessarily in order to eat. Is he to blame? Nature has created him quite claiming or it has left him margin to evolve in that way. If we saw that he is not to blame, since he is not a sensible being, shouldn’t he limit his “wilderness”? Can we compare the wilderness coming from his instinct with the one resulting from a kind of logical procession?

The work was constructed initially with earthly material (metal) and then some plastic (human derivative) was used aiming to show the human transgression – intervention.